|
Text: John 10:11-18
(1 John 3:1-2)
Jubilate (3rd Sunday after
Easter) The Good Shepherd In the name
of our Good Shepherd, dear friends in Christ:
Some time back I read an article by a fellow who was commenting about
how through over use and “inflation” the meaning of certain words changes over
time. He told a story about his son who
was in the first grade. After the first
week of school, the boy was showing off to his father the fruits of his labors
there. He kept pulling things out of his
school backpack and displaying them, all the while chattering excitedly and
obviously bursting with pride in his accomplishments. He had several drawings in crayon, some
completed lettering and counting worksheets each bearing adhesive gold stars,
and various other projects he had done.
The father was genuinely pleased, and wishing to encourage his son, he
showed great interest and admiration for what he was being shown. Finally he said, “This is wonderful,
Billy. You’re doing such good
work.” The boy suddenly stopped his gleeful presentation. A look of abject misery spread across his face as he stared at his Father in stunned silence. Big tears welled up in the corners of his eyes and his lower lip began to quiver. All at once he dropped everything, spun around, ran to his room, and threw himself on the bed crying. The boy’s
father, being naturally mystified by this strange response, went to
investigate. At length, because it took
some time to get the answer from between the boy’s sniffles and gasps, he as
made to understand that “good” was the very worst judgment he could have
rendered. It turned out that in an
effort to avoid discouraging under achievers, the
school had adopted a new way of speaking when it came to student
evaluations. “Good” was the lowest
rating and really meant “completely unacceptable” – but by using this
terminology, no matter how poorly a child performed, he could still think of
himself as “good”. If you wanted to say
that a student’s work was good and mean it, you had to say, “Marvelous” or
“Excellent” or “Terrific”. So, without
intending to, the father had deeply insulted his son and his work. Fortunately, now that he understood his
“mistake”, he was able to correct the damage.
But it’s interesting to me that despite the school’s
very scientific and politically correct attempt to avoid discouraging children
by using only positive words, the kids could see right through it. They knew the difference between good and
lousy work regardless of what the teachers called it. But I
wonder if there isn’t something similar (albeit in the opposite direction)
going on in the morning’s Gospel lesson.
There, Jesus calls himself the “Good” Shepherd. And what exactly he means by that is
explained as he contrasts his performance of duty with that of a shepherd who
is a mere hireling. We see that the
latter is little more than an opportunist.
He works for a paycheck; that‘s all.
He couldn’t care less about the sheep.
His only interest in them is the money their owner will pay him for
tending them. Now, he does the work, as
long as it’s not too much trouble; but if the going gets tough or dangerous,
you can forget it. When the wolf comes
prowling around, the hireling runs for his life and leaves the sheep to fend
for themselves – something sheep don’t do too terribly well, and so they are
all lost, killed, or scattered. But to the
Good Shepherd, the sheep are something more than just a way to make a
living. He knows them and they know
him. There’s a relationship between
them. He takes care of them
because he cares for them. And he
is prepared to sacrifice his own life if necessary to defend them from
harm. That’s what makes him the Good
Shepherd. But it’s here that I have to ask,
“Isn’t that way above and beyond the call of duty even for a good
shepherd?” I mean, many of you are in
farming, and I suppose you’d say you’re good at what you do. And most of you own or have owned
livestock. They’re your animals. You are not just hirelings. And sure, you’re not going to ignore or abuse
the animals: they’re your business—but
how many of you bother to get to know them on a personal level? And while I’m sure that you take reasonable
measures to defend your animals from predators or theft, how many of you would
be willing to defend them at the cost of your own life? Or who would say to your son or daughter,
“Look after the hogs or steers today, and don’t let any harm come to them even
if it means you have to die”? That would be absurd, wouldn’t
it? When all is said and done, they are
just dumb animals. They’re your
property, and they can be replaced if lost.
It doesn’t make sense to die trying to defend them. We all recognize that human life is far more
important (all of us except a few wackos
at PETA anyway). And if it ever comes
down to an “it’s them or me” situation, even the best farmer is going to say
good-bye to the livestock. And if you’re thinking that
perhaps way back in Bible times people thought about
it differently, that would be wrong.
Even good shepherds would never think of dying for their sheep. Quite the contrary, they raised sheep for the
express purpose of dying for people.
Although they provided wool and milk as well, they were raised primarily
for people to eat. But beyond that, in a
religious context, they were also raised to be sacrificial animals. Sheep were raised to sacrifice for sin. They were taken to the temple and killed so
that sinful people could be forgiven and live before Lord without fear of his
judgment. So both in a
secular and spiritual context, no one would ever think of giving up his life to
save a sheep. So when Jesus says this is what
the Good Shepherd does, it’s clear he’s working with a completely different
understanding of the word “good” than we are.
His use of good is the height of understatement. For the shepherd to lay down his life for the
sheep is exactly opposite what is expected.
It’s extraordinary, phenomenal, astonishing behavior, far, far beyond
the call of duty. And that’s the point
that often gets overlooked when we think of Jesus as the Good Shepherd. Understand that it’s just a picture. Jesus is not really a shepherd nor are we sheep. But
using this image that is a shocking upset of the natural order of a shepherd
sacrificing himself for sheep, Jesus is pointing us to the even greater upset
of his Gospel. Elsewhere Jesus said,
“There is none good but God.” So when he
takes the title “Good Shepherd” for himself, he is claiming to be God—and he’s
saying that he, God, is going to show us what it really means to be good
by laying down his life for us. This is
the astounding message of the Good Shepherd discourse: that the God of creation, infinite,
all-powerful, and all wise, is going to sacrifice himself for the benefit of
his finite, weak, and foolish creatures.
It’s a truth that should cause us to hold our breaths in wonder – it’s
the amazing part of amazing grace. And in today’s Epistle reading, And because he is our Father, he
is infinitely closer to us that even the best shepherd is to his sheep. The “father” relationship that John proclaims
speaks of a tenderness and person-to-person intimacy that is closer than we can
imagine. To God, we are not just “one of
the flock” or “one of his creatures”.
He knows us. He knows us
individually. He knows us in far more
detail that we know ourselves. To give
us a small glimpse into how well he knows us, we’re told that he has our hairs
numbered; but it means much more than that.
He knows our thoughts, hopes, desires – more than that,
he is interested in them all because he cares for us. You can hear John’s wonder as he
marvels over this incomprehensible love that God has for us. In his mind, he is asking with the Psalmist,
“What is man that you are mindful of him?”
How is it that the Almighty God wastes his time with puny,
insignificant, and pathetic creatures such as ourselves? But he’s got the answer: “We are his children.” By creating us in his image, God shared part
of himself in us. And even then, he was
planning something even greater to bring us into closer communion. He was planning to become one of us in his
Son Jesus Christ. In him, the God Man,
our Father wants to bridge the gap that separates us from him. In Christ, God wants us to know him like he
knows us. And we do know him. How?
Just like the sheep know the shepherd, by listening to his voice and
feeling his touch. It happened first
when you were born – or rather, reborn into his family. In Baptism you heard his voice in the Word
and felt his touch in the water. That’s
where laid down his life for you. And
there he gave you part of himself: he
gave you his own Holy Spirit. There too,
he gave you faith to believe the amazing Gospel of his love. Then, for most of you, as an
infant in your mother’s arms, you continued to grow in your knowledge of
him. It’s appropriate especially today
that we recognize our mothers as our primary instructors and examples in revealing
God to us. Through them we felt God’s loving touch and heard his voice. Through them God protected, nourished,
disciplined, and so showed us his love.
And from them we learned to trust and follow him. This process of learning to know
him continued through Sunday School, and for many of
us That, after all, is the ultimate
goal: to grow up to be like him—that’s
what children do. Not that we will
become gods—we will always be his children, but we will be far more than we are
now. What will that be? I wish I could tell you, but as John says, “what
we will be has not yet been made known.
But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see
him as he is.” Until then, may we
continue to take every opportunity to increase our knowledge, trust, and
imitation of him by listening the voice of our Good Shepherd and following him. Amen. Soli Deo
Gloria! |