|
Text: 1
Corinthians 1:26-31 (Matthew 5:1-12)
W 4th Sunday in Epiphany Hand-Picked for God’s Team In the name of him who bids us,
“Come, take up your cross, and follow me”, dear friends in Christ: I’m willing to bet that most of you have
vivid memories from your youth of those times when they lined you up to be
chosen for teams. When I was a kid, it
seemed that was the way we divided up groups for everything, from the
neighborhood football game we played on somebody’s front lawn, to whatever it
was we were doing that week for PE at school, even to academic things like
spelling bees and geography contests.
The two kids that everyone just sort of recognized to be the best at
whatever it was you were about to do would be the team captains, and everyone
else would stand there eagerly waiting to be selected by one of them—and hoping
not to be, horror of horrors, the one chosen last. In making their respective selections, what
the team captains were doing was sizing everyone else up, measuring their relative
skills and talents for the task at hand, and trying to forge the best possible
team they could with the available prospects.
Sure, sometimes personal feelings entered into the equation and you’d
have a situation in which a team captain would make ill-advised choices simply
to draft close friends; but as I recall – at least where I grew up – most of us
considered wining and having bragging rights far more important than being with
your friends and losing, so it didn’t happen often. Besides, the team captains usually felt a
responsibility to the team to make it the best they could by choosing
the best they could; so mostly it was a question of: “Which person standing there has most to
offer to our side?” (Strictly business,
you understand; nothing personal.) And
let me say this: as a system of dividing
a group, it works pretty well. It more
or less guarantees that the teams are going to be equal in overall ability, and
therefore that the game, whatever it is, will be fair and competitive. Of course an unintended side effect of the process – call it
“collateral damage” – was that everyone knew where he stood in the eyes of the
others. For better or worse, the order
in which you were chosen pretty much said it all about what people thought
about your ability to help the team.
Which is why, as I understand it, that this particular method of
choosing sides is now frowned upon in most schools. It’s discouraged for fear that it damages
fragile young egos – that it provides too much of the brutal truth for some to
handle … which I suppose may be true in a lot of cases; but having myself been
chosen last more than a couple times, I know that it made me play harder and
better than I might have otherwise just to ensure that it didn’t happen the
next time. It was powerful incentive to
practice. And I also know that in most
neighborhoods, kids still do it when they’re on their own and there’re no
adults around to lecture them about how emotionally hurtful it can be. Why do they do it – even when they’ve been warned of the
potential psychological pitfalls? Well,
like I said, it’s because it works. It’s
intuitively obvious that it does. Besides,
the simple fact is that it’s the way the real world works. Colleges send their talent scouts out to
compete for the best high school athletes, and professional teams try to have
the best draft picks from the colleges.
And again, it happens in more than just sports. Universities are looking for the best
students, and businesses send their head hunters looking for the best
employees. In every walk of life, people
want to get on their teams the kind of players that have something positive to
contribute to the group and its goals.
It’s how you stay competitive.
And so in our minds we assign people a certain value based upon what we
perceive their potential contribution to the group to be – we even put
ourselves on the scale someplace, though maybe not in the same place others
do. And if you’re on the team and you’re
not pulling your weight, well, we’ll cut you from the team and contract someone
who will. No sense in feeling bad about
it. It’s business; not personal. It’s the way the world works; and we all know
it. The problem I’d like to address,
however, comes when we try to bring this particular way of thinking – which is
very suitable to the world – into the church of Jesus Christ where it has
absolutely no place at all. And I hasten
to add that the reason we must leave it out has nothing to do with the damage
it may do to sensitive egos. Last week when we met for worship,
we considered the problems of divisions within the Christian church. And we did it on sort of a macro scale: the question of the proliferation of
denominations and so on. And examining
what Paul had written to the divided church at Corinth and other biblical
references, we saw that some division in the church is necessary, like when
it’s a question of either believing or denying the Word of God and the
teachings of Jesus. The church of Christ
stands on its confession of Jesus and his truth. And it falls when it strays from him. Therefore we must separate ourselves from
error and denials of truth. But other
divisions are not appropriate. Within a
church or church body that shares the true confession of Christ, there should
be unity and harmony between the members; they are, after all, one in
Christ. And when such unity isn’t
evident, you can be sure that the cause of the division has to do with stuff
people bring with them into the church from the world that simply doesn’t
belong. That’s what happened to the
congregation at Corinth. Their Christian
unity was in shambles. They had broken
into arguing factions that bitterly fought with each other over everything. And these factions identified themselves
according to the names of various evangelists or pastors who had served the
church in the past or other prominent Apostles who might have dropped by for a
visit – whichever one they felt most represented the priorities and goals of
their group. So they had the Paul party,
the Apollos party, the Peter party, and others all contending for control – for
preeminence in the congregation. And in last week’s Epistle lesson,
the section of Scripture that immediately precedes this week’s, we heard how
St. Paul took them to task for such foolishness. “What’s this I’m hearing about you?” he
asked them. “Don’t you understand that
Christ is not divided, and that all of your teachers were proclaiming the same
Christ?” He was especially emphatic that
he did want his own name used to identify a faction. He told the ones in the “Paul” group,
“What? Do you think that I died for you? Were you baptized into my name?” He wanted to make it absolutely clear to
everyone that a teacher or pastor in the church is only an instrument through
whom the Lord acts; and that it is by the Lord’s action, and his alone that
people are brought to saving faith and made the children of God by the
preaching of the Gospel and the rebirth of Baptism in water and the Spirit. But now, in today’s text, having
shown them the error of pitting the names of various teachers against each
other, he gets to the deeper, underlying cause of their divisions, which has to
do with the relative value that we tend to assign ourselves and others that I
was talking about earlier. Here in the
church we are on the Lord’s team, so to speak, and we know that we have been
hand-picked by him be a part of it. As
Jesus said, “You did not choose me; but I have chosen you” to be my disciples. And because this is true, thinking as we
naturally do in worldly terms, the assumption is that we were chosen in view of
certain qualities that we posses that the Lord was looking for to add to his
team. Each of us looks at his or her
self and says, “These are the strengths that I bring to the team. Here’s my contribution. This is why I’m needed here.” And we size up each other in the same way,
tending to put greater value on those whom we perceive to be the star players,
and barely tolerating those whom we perceive to be just sort of occupying a
space on the bench – or rather the pew, I should say. And what flows from this system of evaluating ourselves and
others in terms of assets and liabilities to the team is the tendency to see
the strengths as providing leverage and clout:
A person’s opinion is worth more or less depending upon how much he or
she contributes to the team. And for
those star players, or those who perceive themselves to be one, the usually
unspoken assertion is, “You ought to listen to me because I give more, or I’ve
been around longer – or maybe my family has, or because I volunteer more, or
I’ve read and studied more, or I’m just smarter, more spiritual, or pray
more. Whatever it is, it makes me more
valuable to the church than you. It
gives me the right to throw my weight around.
And you’d better listen, because if things don’t go my way, well, watch
out. I’ll take my ball and go
home.” You see, it’s about inflated egos
and power and control and the tendency to think of oneself more highly than
others. It was this sort of attitude
among the members that was really causing the factions at the Corinthian
church, and indeed, is what continues to divide Christian congregations today. And Paul responds to the congregation as if jabbing them with a sharp object to let all of this hot air out of his listeners. “Let’s set the record straight, here. Consider your calling”, he says, “There aren’t many of you who are wise, influential, or of noble birth. You aren’t what we would call the top draft picks. No, quite the contrary, what we see is that God consistently chooses the foolish, the weak, and the lowly precisely to shame those who think themselves to be wise, strong, and exalted.” Simply stated, the Lord didn’t pick you to be part of his team because he was attracted to your finer qualities – the strengths you think you had to offer. Exactly the opposite is true. You were nothing. You had nothing to contribute. He chose to rescue you when you were utterly helpless: spiritually paralyzed, blind, deaf, and dead in sin. He redeemed you in Christ Jesus because you have no redeeming qualities to do the job yourself. Paul’s words are strong – insulting even; but he needs to
be. He isn’t the least bit worried about
bruising sensitive egos. In fact, what
he wants to do is crush their egos completely.
Ego and misplaced self-esteem are the problem. They have no place in God’s kingdom. The kingdom belongs to those who are poor in
spirit. I’m reminded of the story of the
young vicar who was asked by the pastor assigned to train him why it was he
wanted to become a pastor in the church.
The young man replied, “I just want to give my heart to Jesus.” The older man scowled at him and said,
“Really? And just what do you think
Jesus wants with that stinking piece of trash?”
Hard words to be sure – but right on target. And this is important: whatever qualities, virtues, strengths, or
attributes we imagine we have that the Lord finds attractive in us, or that
makes us worth more to the church than anyone else is an obstacle to faith and
trust in Christ. Thinking that we are
worth something in God’s sight – and by that I mean something that he considers
worthy of merit and standing before him – empties the cross of Christ of its
power. The cross of Christ alone, his
suffering and death to atone for our sin and his resurrection to life, is our
only righteousness, holiness, and redemption.
It’s the only thing that any of us has going in our favor – but it’s
more than enough. And so, what we see is that the cross is the great leveler. Coming into the church through it – and there
is no other way – imparts to each of us a radical equality. We’re not members of a team chosen for our
talents or what we might be able to contribute.
It is sin even to think in such terms.
Rather, in Christ Jesus, we are members of a family, and all of us are
dearly loved by one Father. He values
each of us the same, and he has called us into the church of his Son to live as
his family and to love each other as he loves us. And so, like members of a family, we’re not
in competition with one another.
Instead, each of us is to look out for the good of the others –
especially the good of those who are in need or who are weak in some way. That’s how families operate: they rally around to support and defend the
members who need help without thinking about the cost. Or to say it another way, here in the church
it’s not business; it’s personal. It’s
only personal. And it’s as personal as
it gets. And with this proper understanding of who we are in the church,
we will not be divided into factions vying with each other for power and
control. We have one Lord and master,
and that’s enough. But following him
together in harmony, we who are foolish, weak, and lowly by worldly standards
can be used by him to accomplish great things.
Recall that Jesus did not recruit his initial followers from the
universities and palaces and major businesses.
No, he gathered common laborers and people from the fringes of
society: the tax collectors, the radical
zealots, and the poor and the outcast.
With them he did amazing things precisely because God’s strength in
manifest in human weakness. In the same way, he equips certain members of the church
today with the gifts and talents needed to accomplish his will. He gives these gifts to those he pleases, not
to raise those who receive them higher than the others – not to give them cause
for boasting – but so that they can be used for the benefit of the whole
group. So if, having brought you into
his family, the Lord has blessed you with wisdom, spiritual insight, worldly
wealth, the ability to lead and organize, or any other talents and skills, you
are to use them in the church with an attitude of Christ-like service, grateful
to him for the opportunity to show your thankfulness in your labors for him. So, with all that has been said, may God our Father make us
one in Christ Jesus. May he grant to us
such gifts so that we who are nothing can by his strength and power accomplish
much. And may he keep us poor in spirit,
so that we will inherit his kingdom, and do all of our boasting in the
Lord. In Jesus’ name. Amen. Soli Deo Gloria! |