|
Text: Synoptic Passion Reading from the Four
Gospels
X Good Friday X The Great Exchange In the name of him who loved us and
gave himself for us, dear friends in Christ:
The morning of Good Friday, early, sometime before eight o’clock,
Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea, was a man caught between a rock
and a hard place. He had before him the
chief priests and leaders of the Jews, along with a large crowd of their very
vocal supporters, all angrily demanding that a sentence of death be passed upon
the prisoner they had brought to him.
This man Jesus of Nazareth, they claimed, was a dangerous criminal and a
disturber of the peace, who was stirring up political unrest throughout the
entire region. They had many other
accusations; but Pilate knew the truth:
that they had brought Jesus here because they considered him a threat to
their own authority and prestige. He
knew that Jesus was a religious teacher whose doctrines and methods were
upsetting them for two reasons: because
they were different than their own teachings, and because they were gaining
popularity. And that made them
jealous. The whole thing was about
religion, and “market share” of the people’s attention; and Pilate could not
have cared less about it. It should have been that
simple. Unfortunately, it wasn’t, mostly
because Pilate was worried about maintaining his own authority and
prestige. This position he had as
governor of And if that weren’t bad enough, there were a
few recent missteps that made things worse.
You see, Pilate didn’t understand the Jews very well at first. He didn’t know how fanatical they were about
the practice of their faith and how sensitive they were about having the idols
and representations of other gods around – especially around their temple in That and a couple of similar
episodes made Pilate realize that he was walking on some very thin ice. And that’s why he found himself in such a
tight spot when Jesus was brought to him.
On one hand, it was his job to uphold Roman law and order. He had to assume control of the
situation. He could not let himself appear
to be weak and to bend before the demands of these lawless Jews. That was no way to govern, and he knew
it. On the other hand, if he didn’t give
them what they wanted and they complained to the Emperor about his letting an
anti-Roman rebel go free, well, he had a pretty good idea where that would
lead. Earlier in the trial, he thought
he found his way out when he heard that Jesus was from Galilee, which was
Herod’s jurisdiction, not his. And Herod
just happened to be in town for the Passover celebration. So Pilate sent Jesus to Herod for him to deal
with; but Herod sent him back. The
crimes Jesus was accused of took place in Judea. It was Pilate’s case. And so it is that we find Pilate
scrambling to find another way to let Jesus go, but to do so in a way that
would not result in more trouble with the Emperor. That’s when he remembered the annual Passover
tradition by which he released one prisoner from the Roman dungeons, whichever
one the crowd chose. It was a gesture of
Roman benevolence that on the festival on which the Jews remembered their
freedom from slavery that they were allowed to have one of their own set
free. To Pilate it seemed
foolproof. He knew that it was the
religious leaders who hated Jesus, but that he was quite popular with the
crowd. If the crowd asked for Jesus,
Pilate could tell the Jewish leaders, “Hey, I’d like to help you guys, but the
crowd has spoken.” They couldn’t
complain to the Emperor if their argument was with their own people. And just to hedge his bet, he put up against
Jesus someone whom he knew that the crowd was quite happy to see in Roman
custody and sitting on death row: a man
named Barabbas. Barabbas was a notorious ne’er-do-well and murderer, and
probably had been most of his life. In
some fictionalized accounts you may have seen, he is portrayed as a rebel
against Rome, and therefore something of a local folk hero; but Pilate would
not have been so stupid to put up a man like that. No, to release Jesus he would have put forth
the kind of guy that everyone would agree that the world is better
without: a bully, a fighter, a
extortionist; a man who cares nothing for anyone and whose criminal history is
such that people would line up to buy lottery tickets to be part of the
execution detail. The case of that
fellow in Florida who kidnapped a child from her home and raped and murdered
her comes to mind. That’s the kind of guy Barabbas was. And it may be that we get a bit of his history from his
unusual name. Normally Jewish men in
this period were known by two names:
their first name followed by their father’s name with the prefix “Bar”,
which means “son of”. So, for example,
Simon Bar Jonah, which was Peter’s real name, means Simon son of Jonah. Barabbas (or more properly Bar Abbas) doesn’t
seem to have a first name. It’s almost
like no one bothered to take the time to give him one. And the “Abbas” in his last name means
“father”. So his name actually means
“son of father” – which is pretty generic and probably indicates there was some
question about his parentage and that no one wanted to claim him. From his mother’s perspective he was his
father’s son – whoever his father was, and she didn’t know for sure – nor did
she seem to care. And yes, this is
speculation; but I’d call it an educated guess; and I’d further speculate that
Barabbas grew up as a child of the dirty streets and back alleys, unwanted,
unloved, and thereby learning to love no one, surviving only by his wits, his
will to survive, and his willingness to be meaner and tougher than the
competition. So now, when Pontius Pilate offers to free either Jesus or
Barabbas, he believes it’s his way out.
He knows that the crowd couldn’t possibly want Barabbas, and that Jesus
has lots of popular support. What he
doesn’t know, however, is that Jesus’ supporters are all afraid. Most of them have run off and are
hiding. And the few that are around to
witness the present goings-on are scared into silence. At the same time, the leaders and chief
priests are campaigning for Barabbas. There
are several reasons why the crowd would agree to choose him. Some because they think like their leaders
do, others because they’re disappointed in Jesus – he’s not the Messiah they’d
hoped for; some, like the money changers at the temple, because Jesus threatens
their livelihood, and some because they’re just the kind of riff-raff who
always seem to attach themselves to destructive mobs. But I suspect that for many it had something
to do with Jewish pride and nationalism.
If the crowd chooses Barabbas, they show their support for their own
leaders over and against the plans and desires of the hated Romans. It’s a way to thumb their noses at Rome and
to manipulate the governor. It’s a way
to control Pilate and make him look like a fool – and it’s too good an
opportunity to turn down. They call for
the release of Barabbas. So Pilate is frustrated once again in his effort to escape
his dilemma; but he gives it one more try.
Though he knows Jesus is innocent, he orders him to be beaten. Such beatings were done with very heavy whips
or with wooden rods and they frightful to watch. The goal was to bruise the victim deeply and
to crack a few ribs so that he’d have a long recovery period and plenty of time
to reflect upon his misdeeds. It was the
kind of punishment meted out to serious criminals who didn’t quite deserve the
death penalty. In ordering it for Jesus,
Pilate knows it’s a concession that he should not make: it’s wrong to beat an innocent man; but he
hopes that it will satisfy the Jewish leaders’ bloodlust, and at the same time,
earn Jesus the sympathy of the crowd so that when he offers again to let Jesus
go, they’ll agree. But as we heard, in the end it only added to Jesus’
suffering. The leaders and the crowd saw
they had Pilate on the ropes. His
weakness in dealing with them proved that if they kept pushing, they could get
whatever they wanted. Pilate finally
caved in – though not without one last failed effort to maintain his
dignity. By washing his hands before
them he hoped to distance himself from this miscarriage of justice that he was
presiding over; but that water could not wash away his responsibility or his
guilt for Jesus’ death. And so it was that the exchange took place: the notorious, justly condemned murderer,
“son of father”, was set free, while the perfectly righteous Son of the Father was condemned to die – to die
by the most cruel and brutal form of torture ever conceived. Having already been beaten once, Jesus was
flogged again; this time with the flesh-tearing flagellum administered to all
those who were to be crucified. All the
while his tormentors and enemies jeered at him, deriving sadistic pleasure from
his pain. Later, suspended between
heaven and earth by iron spikes that pulled on tender wounds and grated against
bone, they continued their taunting, “If you are the Son of God, save
yourself!” But it was precisely because he was the Son of God that he
did not save himself. For this he had
come into the world and been born a son of man:
to make this great exchange.
Everyone else in this story – in
this whole world – has but one goal:
to save himself. That’s why the
Jewish leaders brought Jesus to Pilate.
That’s why Pilate vacillated and ultimately caved in. That’s why Barabbas led the life of crime he did. That’s why we sin against God and our
neighbors every day. Everyone is trying
to save or do something for himself at the expense of others. That’s what sin is all about. It’s the exact opposite of love – love that
forgets self and gladly suffers whatever it takes for the benefit of
others. God is such love, and so God
makes the great exchange. He takes all
that harms us on himself: our sin, our
justly deserved suffering, and our death; and he gives us his own righteousness
and life. And we too must make exchanges. We must exchange our own faces for the people
in this story. We must see ourselves
among the leaders who willfully want to destroy Jesus. They oppose Jesus because he threatens their
sense of their own goodness – their belief that they are able to save
themselves. We stand with them whenever
we imagine that we are pleasing God by our obedience to his commands. We must see ourselves in the crowd. They have mixed motives for wanting to
destroy Jesus: their livelihoods, their
wicked pleasures, their desire to be in charge – to play God, whatever. It all amounts to the same thing: me and me first. We must see ourselves in Pilate, weakly
protesting that we want to stand up for Jesus, but giving in and selling out
when we perceive that the cost is too high. … And finally, facing all this
corruption so evident within us, we must by God’s grace see ourselves in
Barabbas: the condemned criminal
unexpectedly and undeservedly set free in God’s great exchange. … Amen. Soli Deo Gloria! |