|
Text: Hebrews 10:1-10
X 2nd Lent Midweek, Songs
of the Passion Series Hymn: Not All
the Blood of Beasts Bleeding
Love In the name of him who shed his
precious blood for us, dear friends in Christ:
as we have been pursing this series of meditations inspired by some of
the classic hymns of the Lenten season, I’m reminded how it is that some of
them seem to soar above the rest of the pack.
I’m thinking of such masterpieces as O
Sacred Head Now Wounded or Stricken
Smitten and Afflicted to name but a few.
Such hymns possess the perfect blend of poetic imagery and melodic mood. They appeal to our hearts and minds in a very
powerful way and they move us to greater depths of feeling and reflection. They have rightly earned their place as the
seasonal favorites of many Christians. The hymn I’ve selected for this
evening’s meditation however is not one of them. No, I can’t imagine that it’s on anyone’s
list of favorites. I mean, as a hymn Not All the Blood of Beasts doesn’t have
much going for it. It’s got one of those
generic hymn tunes that’s about as bland as tofu and
as unmemorable as the phone book. No one
is going to walk away this evening humming it in their heads or be caught
tomorrow singing it in the shower. And
then, even worse, is the subject matter. Its opening line presents us with the ugly
mental portrait of countless animal sacrifices.
We’re invited to visualize a spectacle of carnage: whole herds of slaughtered oxen, sheep, and
goats, and literally bucketsful of blood being poured out upon a blazing altar
day after day … year after year … and all, as it turns out, to no avail. Yuck.
Who wants to sing about that? The
only good thing about this hymn is that it’s so mercifully short. Or so it may seem at first
glance. Obviously I wouldn’t have chosen
it unless I thought there was something worthwhile for us to consider here; and
I hope by the time we’re done, I’ve convinced you that it is in its own way a
real gem – one that is usually too quickly passed over by our eyes that naturally
tend to seek out brighter and shinier stones. But first a little historical
information: this hymn was written by an
Englishman named Isaac Watts who, as you can see from his dates in the hymnal,
lived his adult life in that period about two hundred years after the beginning
of the Protestant Reformation. Anyway, very early in the
Reformation, Luther saw that hymn singing would be a great way to teach the
essentials of the faith to the people sitting in the pews. Being something of a musician, he wrote
several such hymns. And following that
pattern, many more accomplished German hymn writers produced an amazingly large
tradition of Lutheran hymnody: hymns
that teach doctrine or that tell the story of a biblical text. The idea was to support and reinforce the
faith of the congregation by having them sing what they believed. And this was important, because a lot of
people back then couldn’t read; and even if they could, there was no way most
people could get their hands on a Bible.
Hymns helped the people retain what they had been taught. But you probably remember that there
were other reformers who did not follow Luther; guys like Calvin and Zwingli
and several others. And for the most
part, they rejected the idea of creating any new hymns. They rejected it for the same reason they
rejected things like religious art and stained glass windows. They felt that anything that wasn’t actually mentioned
in the Bible was wrong. Specifically
with respect to hymns they said, “What’s wrong with the hymns we already have –
the ones God gave us; namely the Psalms?
Are you saying they aren’t good enough?”
They felt that anyone who wrote a new hymn was insulting God’s inspired
Word. And that was the tradition in But anyway, the history lesson now complete,
we turn our attention to the actual words of the hymn for this evening. The biblical text that inspired You can see quite easily that the
first verse of the hymn is simply a poetic restatement of that Bible
passage. And as I said earlier, it
rather forcefully confronts us with the unpleasant image of Old Testament
worship. And that’s really hard for us
to relate to. When we think of going to worship
the Lord, we think of nice, clean, climate-controlled churches, and sitting in
pews, and singing hymns, and listening to sermons, and so on. It’s all very orderly and neat. It’s designed to be appealing. It is, for lack of a better word,
“sanitized”. Old Testament worship was
anything but that. No, if you were a
Jewish person, going to the temple to worship the Lord meant standing out in
the hot sun in a long line with a crowd of sweaty, irritable people, and being
surrounded by pens full of foul-smelling animals standing in their manure and all
making their crazy animal sounds while the voices of the merchants tried to
shout above them. It was loosely
organized chaos. And while all this is
going on, you’re standing there trying to keep your own terrified sacrificial
animal under your control until you reached the head of the line. And once you got there your worship was
reduced to just one thing: blood.
That’s what you were there for:
to hold your animal still while a priest reached down with his knife,
slit your animal’s throat, and collected its blood in a bowl. You held the trembling lamb or goat while its
life ebbed away until finally it collapsed in death. And then you put the dead animal on your
shoulders and went your way while the priest poured its blood on the fiercely blazing
flames of the altar. That was it. You returned to your home dirty and tired, hands
sticky with blood, and clothes permeated with the acrid smell of the smoke of
burning blood. Got the picture? You know, after attending worship like that I
don’t think anyone walked away saying, “My, wasn’t today’s service especially
uplifting? I could really feel the Spirit
moving among us.” No, it just didn’t
happen that way. But what was it all about? As hard as it is for us to relate to that
kind of worship, I think that in the modern church there is even more
misunderstanding about why they
worshipped that way. Most people simply
think, “The Old Testament was all about following the law. And since God commanded the people to bring
sacrifices to him, they did. They had no
choice. They had to obey the law. Now in the New Testament period, we are under
grace and don’t have to follow those nasty old sacrificial laws anymore.” And most people are grateful for that,
because it’s a lot nicer worshipping in a place like this than one that looks
and smells like a slaughter house. And
that last bit I’ll agree too; but the idea that Old Testament sacrificial
worship was all about the law is completely wrong – and I daresay if we don’t
understand what worship was about then, we really can’t understand what it’s
supposed to be about now. You see, there were lots of ancient religions
– and there’re still a few today – in which people worshipped their gods by
bringing animal sacrifices to them. They
brought their gods sacrifices as gifts in order to show them how devoted they
were, or how much they were willing to give up, or to
try to buy favors from their gods. The
idea was that the gods accepted the sacrifices as groceries for their feasts on
And that’s why the blood was so important. God didn’t take the carcasses of the dead
animals; all he wanted was the blood – for he had said, “The life is in the blood.” That’s why Jewish people were prohibited from
drinking blood or eating anything that contained it. God said that the life of every living thing
belonged to him – and that the life was in the blood. So when the priest collected the blood of my
sacrifice I could see in a very tangible way that God was accepting its life in
place of mine – and that its life was literally being consumed in the flames of
the altar in my place. And this is how you’d worship year after year;
and every time you did you were confronted by a very graphic and gritty
testimony of the terrible consequences of your sin. You saw up close and personal that God’s
justice demands death and blood – but at the same time, you could also see
God’s grace and love for you in providing a way for something else to die in
your place. When the animal died, the
priest was able to say to you, “Your sins are forgiven.” And you received that forgiveness by faith,
trusting that God’s promise to count your sin against that goat or lamb was
true. So we should see that the whole Old Testament sacrificial
system of worship was really about the Gospel – the problem with it was that
there was no end to it. That’s what the
writer of Hebrews is saying in the Bible passage, and that’s what his hymn is
about. It was never the blood of animals
that took away sins. How could they? Though it may offend PETA activists, in the
mind of God a human life is worth more than the lives of all the animals he
ever created. No number of animals
however large could die for the sin of a single man – much less for the sins of
many. No, what really took away the sins
of all those Old Testament worshippers was what their bloody sacrifices
prefigured: they all pointed ahead to
the once and forever all-sufficient sacrifice of the true Lamb of God – his
Son, Jesus Christ – the sacrifice that God himself gave for us. Trusting in God’s promises, when they put
their hands on the heads of their sacrifices and confessed their sins, they
were really putting their sins on Jesus. That’s the idea captured in verse three of this hymn. We are to understand that when we stand here
and confess our sins, we are doing exactly the same thing. By faith, we are laying our hands on the
thorn crowned head of Jesus and putting the burden and consequences of our sins
on him. And then, as verse four says, instead
of seeing the blood poured out on the burning altar to show us that the price
is paid, we see the true terrible justice and wrath of God poured out as the Sacrifice
for our sin is raised up on the cross to suffer and die in the worst possible
way. And there too we see his great love
for us literally bleeding from his
many wounds – and with his blood, his life ebbing away from him and dripping down to
us … to give us his life. … A powerful message indeed in what’s an otherwise unappealing
hymn condemned to be nobody’s favorite. But you know, sometimes a master jeweler finds
a gem so beautiful that he knows putting it in an elaborate setting will only
detract attention from what he wants people to see and appreciate. So he sets it alone, simply, without any
embellishment so that you are forced to focus on the stone itself. I think that’s what Isaac Watts accomplished
with this hymn. With it he points us to
the cross, to the Savior nailed on it, and to his great self-sacrificial love for us so that: Believing we rejoice, To see the curse remove; We bless the Lamb with cheerful
voice And sing his bleeding love. Amen. Soli Deo Gloria! |