|
Text: 1
John 4:1-11
U Rogate (6th Sunday of
Easter) Test the Spirits In the name of him who loved us and
gave his life for us, dear friends in Christ:
a few years back there was a saying that I kept hearing all the time
that went, “Love means never having to say you’re sorry.” It’s one of those statements that first strikes
you as sort of a nice thought; and because it’s easy to remember, rolls off the
tongue smoothly, and seems to contain some profound wisdom, it’s no wonder that
people kept repeating it. Unfortunately,
however, it’s one of those profound worldly truths that doesn’t hold up well under
analysis. I mean, what’s it supposed to
mean? Does it mean that if I say that I
love you, I shouldn’t have to apologize if I hurt you by my wrong or negligent
behavior? That’s awfully presumptuous,
don’t you think? Or does it mean if I
say, ”love you”, then you get a free
pass to abuse me as you please without ever having to concern yourself about
how your behavior affects me? I don’t
care how loving a relationship is; that can’t be healthy, can it? I mean look: God loves you – he loves you more than you can
possibly imagine – and yet at the same time, he calls you to repent of your
sins; that is, he wants you to say you’re sorry and mean it. I think one of the reasons we don’t hear that
statement so much anymore is because the people who said they loved each other and
tried it found out that it didn’t work very well. Of course these days it seems the world has moved beyond
that trite statement to a new and even more elastic definition of love. Now it’s widely held that if you love
someone, you’re never to say anything critical to them, anything that might be
construed as negative, or anything that might possibly wound their self esteem. You must never challenge the validity of
their ideas, the logic of their thought processes, the quality of their work, or
the ethics of their actions. And nowhere
is this standard of love to be applied more rigorously than in the Church of
Jesus Christ. And perhaps I’m overstating it a bit; but in one month a
delegate from this congregation and I will be attending our church’s district
convention. And what I’ve discovered is
that when the larger church assembles at a gathering like that – which are
held, not incidentally, largely to ensure that we continue to be theologically
united in our confession of the faith – the one thing we cannot discuss is
theology. The moment anyone takes the
floor and raises a concern about our increasingly diverging doctrine and
practice, he’s immediately accused of being unloving and shouted down. Any possibility that we might have a frank
and open discussion about the matters that divide us is barred for fear that something
critical or negative might be said. So problems
are allowed to fester and grow even worse because we are deathly afraid of
having a theological argument, as if that were the worst thing that might
happen. I know some families avoid
discussing theology for the sake of unity – but how much sense does it make to
avoid talking about theology in the church?
It’s like going to a convention of Republicans or Democrats and not
talking about politics. It doesn’t make
sense; but still the majority seems to think it’s better to maintain the outward
illusion of unity and brotherly love than to do the hard but loving work of
actually achieving it. They’ve bought
into this notion that love means avoiding conflict at all costs. And sometimes I sense this same kind of
resistance to confronting divisive issues and doubtful doctrines even within
the congregation. But this is a work we must do; we
really have no option. If the church is
to stand on anything solid, it has to be the truth. And standing upon and declaring what is true
necessarily entails declaring and avoiding what is false. And in this morning’s Epistle lesson, You have to test it. And how do you do that? The general answer is that you have to
compare it with what God has given us as the objective standard of truth. In the book of Acts we read about the
missionary adventures of Of course, the Bible is a pretty wide ocean; so we could get
a little more specific. The apostle John
in his day was dealing with false teachers who were trying to infuse elements of
Greek philosophy into Christianity. And
because these teachers (who would eventually be called Gnostics) held that
matter and the physical components of the universe were inherently evil, they
tried to spiritualize everything about Jesus. They wanted to remove the physical, human side
of him because they thought it wasn’t possible that a God who is a perfect
spiritual being could have anything to do with something so low and disgusting
as a human body. It’s in response to
this kind of thinking that John writes that anyone who denies that Jesus Christ
has come in the flesh is teaching
against Christ. Now, understand that
these people thought they were saying nice things about Jesus when they denied
his humanity. They meant to honor him. In fact, they thought they were honoring him
even more than people like us who say that he is both divine and human. But John says that by denying what the
Scriptures teach about Jesus, they show that they possess the spirit of
antichrist. Now, understand that John’s test about Christ coming in the
flesh is not meant to be comprehensive.
He goes on to say that anyone who does not acknowledge Jesus is not from
God. John understands that the person and
work of Jesus Christ is really what the Scriptures are all about. He means that anyone who does not acknowledge
what the Scriptures say about Christ speaks against him. So, anything that denies his true divinity or
his true manhood, anything that detracts from the full atonement he made for
our sins by his suffering death on the cross, anything that goes against his
teaching, denies his miracles, whatever, any of these things reflects the
spirit of antichrist. And it’s important to understand how
little leaven it takes to infect the whole lump. We tend to look for the deceptions of Satan
in the obvious places: in things like
witchcraft, in false religions and cults, and in brazen attacks on Christianity
like The Da Vinci Code – the popular
book now made into a movie that says blasphemous things about Jesus, like he
wasn’t really the Son of God, that he didn’t die for the sins of the world,
that he was married to Mary Magdalene, and that he intended that she and her
children after her head up a religion that was more like the fertility cults of
the ancient Canaanites than anything else.
These things are full of dangerous and false ideas, sure; but they have
the advantage of being clearly identified as such. They are practically labeled with bright red
tags that say: “Warning: Contains the
spirit of antichrist. Harmful or fatal
if swallowed”; so there’s little chance of any of us being taken in. But Satan doesn’t usually go around
wearing a red suit and carrying a pitchfork so that he’s so easily
identified. We’re told that he disguises
himself as an angel of light to work his mischief. And because we’re usually busy
concentrating on the obvious, we often miss him where he does the greatest
damage – and especially now that his movements are protected by this false idea
of love that says it’s wrong to test, to challenge, or to analyze or criticize
what’s being taught and done in the church. Let me give you an example of what
I’m talking about. This is from the
local newspaper last week. There’s a
column called “Ask the Pastor” that allows readers to get a pastor’s response
to their theological questions. A reader
asks (and I’m quoting now), “If I am a good person, will I go to heaven?” (Great question, by the way.) The pastor replies, “Whether we’re ‘good’ or
not is not the core issue; the critical question, instead, is this: ‘who sits on the throne of our heart—God or
self?’ If we refuse God his rightful
sovereignty over our lives, then we are guilty of self-aggrandizing
idolatry. We must have no gods above him
(Exodus 20:3), including ourselves.” Now, I can verify that the person
responding to the question is a Christian pastor. He’s a really swell guy, and I have every
reason to believe that he’s a faithful man.
Certainly the answer he gives here sounds like a perfectly biblical
answer. But if you follow what he really
said, it’s not being good that will get you to heaven – it’s obeying the first
commandment (which is being good, isn’t it?).
He started off just fine, but in the end he throws the questioner back
on the law and his own works. He says
nothing here about Christ and his work to save us from sin. You see, though I’m certain he did not intend
it, the answer he gave reflects the spirit of antichrist. It’s an easy trap to fall into. Now, I’m not quite sure how to respond since this
case crosses denominational lines; but this same sort of thing happens even in
our own LCMS. I read a lot of sermons
written by fellow pastors on line, and many of them are chocked full of all
kinds of helpful advice and encouragement for living a good life; but they say
nothing about Christ. Or again, we had a
wedding here yesterday. One of the
recent graduates from Concordia Seward who did an internship at a LCMS school
in a large city told me that most Sundays she sat in the pew and felt like
crying because the pastor there routinely pounded his people with the law and told
them how to be better Christians; but he never gave them the Gospel of Christ
and the assurance of their forgiveness in him – or if he did, he gave it with
conditions – the things they had to do to make it effective. My friends, that’s the spirit of antichrist. It’s a spirit that constantly hovers
around the church and that needs to be challenged, confronted, and driven out. If you read through the Old Testament, one of
the things you soon discover is how short-lived are the periods in which God’s
people are faithful. Following some
mighty act of salvation, everybody will be praising God and trusting in him –
but it never lasts. You turn the page
and find the same people abandoning their trust and sinking into worse sins
than before. What this should impress
upon us is the constant need for renewal, reformation, and revisiting and
reinforcing in the church the old truths that never change precisely because
they are continuously being corrupted by the influence of the world and the
spirit of antichrist. It is the way of this fallen world
that everything good is subject to corruption.
Silver tarnishes, iron rusts, wood rots away. If you want to preserve them, it takes hard
work. If you till the soil and plant a
garden you’ve got to do more than plant good seeds. You’ve also got to pull out the weeds. Their seeds are already in the soil or they
come floating through the air. So it is
with the seeds of antichrist. They’re
already in our sinful flesh. They also
come through the philosophies and ideas of the world and the false teachers who
have gone out into it. It takes constant
work to keep the weeds out. You can’t do
it just once because they keep coming. It
takes a steady guard – constantly testing the spirits to see if they are indeed
from God. And this is what makes the false
idea of love I mentioned before so insidious. In that
view, it’s wrong to be suspect, wrong to demand proof, wrong to question or to
criticize. The cry goes up, “That’s mistrustful,
that’s argumentative, that’s divisive.
Why are you bent on this incessant purification of doctrine all the time? It’s so unloving.” No
it is not. You can look at our text
and see that it’s right after saying “test the spirits” that Do you see it?
Christian love demands that we be willing to take the lumps and suffer
the consequences that will surely come when we test the spirits. But it’s necessary that we do this because we
are all vulnerable to being deceived. Yes,
even me. That’s why it’s part of your
mission as a member of this congregation to test the spirit of what I
teach. Believe nothing just because I
say it. Believe it because you’ve tested
it according to God’s Word and are convinced that he said it. And if by your
testing you believe that I am teaching something amiss, don’t worry about
hurting my feelings. I’d rather you
corrected me than allow me to go on saying something that does not square with
the Word of God. So let us resolve to show this
loving service to each other and test the spirits to verify that they are in
fact from God – and let each of us begin with the spirit within him or
herself. Yes, even our own spirits, our
own beliefs, must be tested to ensure that they accurately reflect God’s
teachings. And where we find doubt, or
uncertainty, or the spirit that says, “Yeah, I know that’s what the bible
teaches, but I don’t believe that”, or this false notion of love that says that
doing the testing is wrong … well, let’s pull up the weeds. Let’s confess these things to Christ Jesus
our Lord, and receiving his forgiveness, let’s pray for his Spirit to help keep
us in his Word. And then, with his grace
and strength, let’s assist each other in testing the spirits that all of us may
walk together unified in God’s truth. In
Jesus’ holy name. Amen. Soli Deo Gloria! |